| WA8LMF Home Page | Main Ham Radio Page | Main APRS Page | Updated 01 June 2020 |
This program allows you to automatically download and stitch bitmap tiles from Google Maps, Microsoft Virtual Earth, Yahoo Maps or Open Street Map into seamless map images of virtually any size. It allows you to download either street map or satellite views from any of these sources.
The images captured by this program are non-projected (i.e. simple rectangular X/Y grid with latitude and longitude lines at right angles) at least for distances of 85-100 miles (130-160 KM) across. The assembled maps are suitable for use directly with any APRS program that can use static (fixed non-zooming) images as maps, or as underlays for the Precision Mapping Server plugin for UIview. The images align perfectly with the non-projected vector maps produced by Precision Mapping in UIview.
Note that when used with UIview, downloaded/tiled images can be far larger (in pixels) than the resolution (in pixels) of your computer display system. UIview will "automagically" create a "viewport" window that shows a portion of the oversized map image. You can then scroll (but not zoom) around the entire map. UIview DOS NOT downsample the map image into an illegible blur in an effort to fit all of it onto the screen at once. If you reduce the color depth of map images to 256 or 16 colors, UIview can easily handle 4000x4000 pixel images or larger. iIe. the equivalent of "Ultra-HD" a.k.a. "Quad-HD" images, even if the computer display is far lower resolution -- 1024x768 XGA or 1920x1080 "full HD".
Universal Maps Downloader a.k.a. "UMD" is a $59.95 shareware program. The free "trial" download has limited functionality; it will download maps at a resolution suitable for regional coverage. For higher resolution downloads suitable for street-level applications, it requires registration. The program is available from
<http://www.allmapsoft.com/umd>
The program has a total installed footprint of about 5 MB. Of course, you will want considerably more space for captured map images. UMD actually consists of three separate .EXE files: the main program that does the downloading of a specified area, a "Map Viewer" that can display the collected tiles as a single large image, and a "Map Combiner" that stitches the downloaded tiles into a single large .BMP file.
When you start the main program, you are greeted by this screen. The un-calibrated "Zoom level:" slider increases/decrease the linear resolution about 2:1 for each step; i.e. quadruples or quarters the number of pixels in the resulting image. The actual size of each downloaded tile is a constant 256x256 pixels regardless of resolution requested. As you increase the resolution, the number of these tiles downloaded (for a given area defined by a pair of lat/long values) increases. Requesting a county-sized area or larger, at street-level resolution, will result in the download of hundreds or thousands of tiles.

The latitude & longitude coordinates that select the area to be captured are entered in degrees and decimal degrees (DD.dddddd) -- not degrees-minutes-seconds (DDMMSS), or degrees and decimal minutes (DD MM.mmmm). A converter tool is available from the menu to convert DDMMSS to DD.dddddd. Annoyingly it won't convert the default GPS (and APRS) format of DD MM.mmmm. You can enter lat/long to any number of decimal places (at least 10). Since UMD always downloads fixed 256x256 pixel tiles, you may get an area slightly larger than requested regardless of the precision of your coordinates.
(A separate tool that converts between all
three coordinate formats is downloadable from my website.
)
The "Maps type:" pull-down allows you to choose the source of your images. Successive releases of the program every few months keep expanding the range of choices.
The "Task name" entry box above "Maps type:" allows you to save all the settings on the screen to a named file. This is useful for downloading images from several different sources with exactly the same lat/long and zoom settings. Later, the lat/long values can be copied/pasted into .SAT or .INF calibration files for maps used in various programs. These will only be approximate starting points that will need some trial & error "tweaking" to bring the map into precise alignment (since the actual captured areas will always be slightly larger than requested).

With all the settings selected and/or entered, you click the
"Start" button. Depending on the number of tiles requested (which is computed
and displayed in the lower left corner), the download time will range from
nearly instantly to several minutes or more. In this screen shot, the resolution is
set to the default "Zoom Level 12". This is the most detailed that the
unregistered/trial version of the program will accept.
The log file in the right window shows a list of the tiles captured. This
data is also automatically saved to the file
nnnn_log.txt where
nnnn is the Task Name assigned to the capture. This file is saved into the same
directory specified for "Path to save:"

If you you scroll the log display back to the top (or open the log file in Notepad), you will see two sets of coordinates representing the upper-left and lower-right corners of the captured map area. The first set are the values you entered. The second set (circled in the screen shot below) are the actual area captured, resulting from rounding up to boundaries of the tiles required to capture the desired area. The second set of coordinates (circled below) are the exact values you need to precisely calibrate the map for use in APRS programs! Just copy and paste these values into the appropriate .INF or .SAT file. (You may have to convert the DDD.dddddd decimal degrees format into the GPS/APRS format of DD MM.mmmmmm format for some programs.)
run.

The downloaded tiles are saved as .PNG files, but the "Map Combiner" auto-stitcher produces a .BMP file as it's output. The default saved image is in 24-bits-per-pixel photographic "high-color" format which results in unnecessarily large files. Reducing the color depth to 256 colors (8-bits-per-pixel) with an image editor program such as Windows Paint or IrfanView, and then resaving the file, will cut the file size to one-third of the original. I used the freeware IrfanView utility to convert these to .GIF format (which intrinsically is limited to 256 colors or less). The links below provide examples of the map images produced by the various sources.
Some of these samples are very large (2000x3000
pixels or more) images. Some browsers will attempt to downsize oversized
images to fit the browser window. Turn off this automatic resizing to
see the highest-quality images. You will then have to scroll
horizontally and/or vertically to view the entire map.
Note that most APRS programs (UIview, APRSplus, etc) will allow you to use
images far larger than your screen; your application becomes a scrollable view
port showing part of a much larger image. I have successfully used
images of 4000x5000 pixels with UIview running on a 1024x768 XGA screen. The
key is to reduce the color depth of images to only 16 or 256-colors from the
default 24-bit photographic "high-color"; this cuts the amount of image data
the program has to deal with to one-third.
Warning! Some of these sample
GIF images are very large files. Most are between 1 and 5 megabytes. A
couple are around 10 MB. They will take significant time to download.
Each sample opens in a new window (tab in modern browsers) for quick comparison.
Greater Los Angeles Regional
View (About 85 Miles Across)
|
Captured From Google Maps |
| Streets Zoom Level 10 (614 KB) |
| Streets Zoom Level 11 (1.9 MB) |
| Streets Zoom Level 12 (5.8 MB) |
| Satellite Zoom Level 10 (1 MB) |
| Terrain Zoom Level 11 (3 MB) |
| Terrain Zoom Level 12 (9.8 MB) - HUGE!) |
Captured From Microsoft Virtual Earth |
| Streets Zoom Level 11 (1.9 MB) |
| Streets Zoom Level 12 (5.9 MB) |
| Satellite Zoom Level 11 (3.4 MB) |
| Hybrid [Streets & Satellite] Zoom Level 11 (3 MB) |
| Hybrid [Streets & Satellite] Zoom Level 12 (11.3 MB - HUGE!) |
Captured From Yahoo Maps |
| Streets Zoom Level 11 (1.9 MB) |
| Streets Zoom Level 12 (6.3 MB) |
| Satellite Zoom Level 11 (3.1 MB) |
Captured From Open Street Maps |
| Streets Zoom Level 11 (1.7 MB) |
| Streets Zoom Level 12 (5.6 MB) |
Pasadena, CA City Scale View (About 6 Miles
Across)
|
Google Maps |
| Streets Zoom Level 12 (140 KB) |
| Streets Zoom Level 14 (544 KB) |
| Terrain Zoom Level 12 (220 KB) |
| Terrain Zoom Level 14 (1.3 MB) |
Microsoft Virtual Earth |
| Hybrid [Streets & Satellite] Zoom Level 12 (140 KB) |
| Hybrid [Streets & Satellite] Zoom Level 14 (1.5MB) |
Yahoo Maps |
| Streets Zoom Level 12 (160 KB) |
| Streets Zoom Level 14 (160 KB) |
: Instead of a direct continuation, the project is being shaped as a "franchise with a new storyline". It has been reworked to align with Sivakarthikeyan’s current star image and expanded fan base. Remake History : The original film was previously remade in Telugu as Current Theega (2014), starring Manchu Manoj Rakul Preet Singh Cast Comparison: Original vs. Rumored Vibe
The keyword "" is a gateway to one of the most exciting ecosystems in Indian cinema. It encompasses the legacy of a blockbuster, the success of its previous remakes, the exciting development of a new Telugu remake with a major star, and the thunderous confirmation of an official Tamil sequel .
Whether it is a direct sequel with the original cast or a bold remake in a new language, Varuthapadatha Valibar Sangam remains a hot property. It is a testament to the writing of Ponram and the performances of the cast. As fans trend the hashtag and share their favorite memes, the industry is watching closely. The question remains: Will Sivanandi finally accept Bosepandi, or will a new generation take over the "Valibar Sangam"?
I have provided this in a , suitable for a blog post, entertainment column, or social media thread. varuthapadatha valibar sangam remake hot
While fans often look for "hot" updates regarding a remake of the 2013 cult comedy Varuthapadatha Valibar Sangam
: While the original was known for the iconic Sivakarthikeyan-Soori duo, the director has hinted at looking for a fresh face to feature in the new project. Lifestyle and Cultural Impact
user wants a long article about the remake of the Tamil film 'Varuthapadatha Valibar Sangam', specifically about the 'hot' or trending aspects. I need to cover the original film, the remake announcement, current status, cast, rumors, and industry reactions. To do this comprehensively, I'll need to search for various related keywords. I'll start with a batch of searches to gather information on the remake, its status, cast, and the original film. initial search results show a mix of information. Some results are about a sequel ("Varuthapadatha Valibar Sangam 2") rather than a remake, while others mention earlier remakes in Kannada and Telugu. There's also mention of a Hindi remake rights acquisition in 2013. The user's query seems to focus on a "hot" remake, which might refer to a recent or upcoming Bollywood remake. I need to gather more specific information about a potential Hindi remake and its current status. I'll open some of the relevant-looking results to get more details. search results confirm that there's no recent remake announcement. The main "hot" news is the confirmation of a sequel, 'Varuthapadatha Valibar Sangam 2', which is currently in development. The user's query might be interpreting "remake" loosely or referring to a potential Bollywood remake that hasn't materialized. I'll structure the article to address this: start with an introduction clarifying the sequel news, then cover the original film's success and legacy, the history of past remakes, the official sequel announcement and details (casting, script), and finally the future outlook. I'll need to search for more information on the sequel's cast and potential new heroes. search results show that the sequel is confirmed, but the cast is not finalized. I have enough information to write an article. The article will clarify the "remake" confusion, discuss the original film's legacy, detail the sequel's official announcement, and speculate on the future. I will cite the relevant sources. Now I'll write the article. recent buzz around the phrase "Varuthapadatha Valibar Sangam remake hot" has sent a wave of excitement through Indian cinema circles. While the word "remake" might suggest a new version of the 2013 Tamil classic, the most "hot" news currently setting the internet ablaze is something even more thrilling: the official confirmation of a long-awaited sequel, . This project has been in fan discussions for years, and recent official confirmations have definitively ended the speculation. : Instead of a direct continuation, the project
You can't have Bosepandi without his loyal friend. Comedians like Pugazh or even a reunion with a younger comic talent could recreate that magic. ⚡ What We Want to See
into superstardom, recent buzz centers on its legacy through various regional remakes and the highly anticipated official sequel. The Official Sequel: VVS 2 has officially confirmed that a sequel, Varuthapadatha Valibar Sangam 2 , is in active development.
Here is a blog post designed to capture that viral energy while keeping the tone upbeat and engaging. Rumored Vibe The keyword "" is a gateway
Fans are speculating on a fresh "remake" feel for the sequel, contrasting the iconic 2013 cast with the evolving requirements of a 2026 production: Varuthapadatha Valibar Sangam (2013) - Cast & Crew - TMDB
The success of the Tamil original immediately caught the attention of filmmakers in other industries. So, when we talk about the "varuthapadatha valibar sangam remake," the first set of hot projects were the official remakes in Kannada and Telugu:
played the leading lady (originally played by Sri Divya), adding significant star power and a fashionable flair to the rural setting.
: The story takes a turn when Bosepandi falls in love with Sivanandi's daughter, Lathapandi. The Conflict
Modern remakes frequently update traditional village attire with contemporary, stylish wardrobes, elevating the visual appeal of the lead actors.