FreeRTOS Support Archive
The FreeRTOS support forum is used to obtain active support directly from Real
Time Engineers Ltd. In return for using our top quality software and services for
free, we request you play fair and do your bit to help others too! Sign up
to receive notifications of new support topics then help where you can.
This is a read only archive of threads posted to the FreeRTOS support forum.
The archive is updated every week, so will not always contain the very latest posts.
Use these archive pages to search previous posts. Use the Live FreeRTOS Forum
link to reply to a post, or start a new support thread.
[FreeRTOS Home] [Live FreeRTOS Forum] [FAQ] [Archive Top] [September 2015 Threads]
Hi all,
I'm using ST's CubeMX implementation on a F4 discovery board. I use ST's USB middlewares with FreeRTOS.
When I get a special OutputReport from PC side I have to answer nearly immediately (in 10-15 ms). Currently I cannot achieve this timing and it seems my high priority tasks can interrupt the USB callback. What do you think, is it possible? Because it's generated code I'm not sure but can I increase the priority of the USB interrupt (if there is any)?
Thank you,
David
10 to 15 ms is very slow, so I'm sure its possible.
Where is the USB callback function called from? If it is an interrupt then it cannot be interrupted by high priority RTOS tasks. Any non interrupt code (whether you are using an RTOS or not) can only run if no interrupts are running.
Without knowing the control flow in your application its hard to know what to suggest. How is the OutputReport communicated to you? By an interrupt, a message from another task, or some other way?
The callback which receive the data from PC is called from the OTGFSIRQHandler (it's the part of the HALPCDIRQHandler function). I think the problem is SysTickHandler's priority is higher than OTGFSIRQHandler and it's cannot be modified, but the scheduler shouldn't interrupt the OTGFSIRQHandler with any task handled by the scheduler. Am I wrong that the scheduler can interrupt the OTGFS_IRQHandler?
The iPad Mira's display is also expected to feature:
To help you decide, here is a quick reference table:
for better integration with Mira Comparing Mira to other iOS control options (like TouchOSC) Cycling '74 Announcing MIRA, a new way to connect with your Max patches
Whether you are looking to beam your iPad screen to a non-Apple television or want to turn your tablet into a powerful multi-touch controller for music production and digital art, bridging the Apple gap requires the right tools.
This is a professional app used by musicians and artists to control
: Recent updates to the Mira Controller App Store Page include options to automatically connect via USB and hide the setup menu. This makes it a highly secure choice for interactive museum or art installations. Supported UI Elements
: Changes track seamlessly across both screens. Sliding a physical finger across an iPad dial instantly updates the data value on the computer, and automated changes on the computer immediately shift the sliders on the tablet.
By providing a comprehensive overview of the iPad Mira, its features, and potential applications, this article aims to inform and engage readers about this intriguing concept. Whether the iPad Mira becomes a reality or remains a rumor, it represents an exciting glimpse into the future of tablet computing and the ongoing innovation in the tech industry.
For audio engineers, multimedia artists, and software developers, Mira is a dedicated iOS companion application developed for .
If you meant , let me know and I’ll explain those in detail.
Thank you for the answer, I think I'm a bit confused with the Cortex ISR priorities :-)
What I can observe is if I use a much higher osDelay in my high priority task I can respond for the received USB message much faster. This is why I think tasks can mess up with my OTG interrupt.
Copyright (C) Amazon Web Services, Inc. or its affiliates. All rights reserved.